Darwin ?

Not that this article about Darwin will lead you to Christ, but at least that you won’t be fooled into using Darwin as an argument that there is no God, or an argument dispelled by #9 below, that we are here by chance.

I pasted in the definition of AGNOSTIC at the end from www.webster.com
So here’s my main thought:  Why would the opinions, research and (supposed) conclusions of one who confesses to being “muddled” and not holding an opinion be the champion of the Atheist movement? 
Compare the lack of facts and conclusions of the Agnostics, and the bold misuse of facts and prideful and condescending teachings of Atheists (one who believes that there is no deity), with the livable beliefs and convictions of Christianity (as taught by the Bible).  Look at the effect of those three belief systems and how they affect everything from a person’s view of life to their self image, and ask yourself which would best serve our children, even IF there were no Christ!
…then go to www.worthynews.com and wonder why Christians all over the world are getting arrested, beaten, cut up, burned and killed just for having a belief system which promotes love, service and freedom….  it’s all a bit confusing!
1ag·nos·tic           Listen to the pronunciation of 1agnostic
ag-ˈnäs-tik, əg-
Greek agnōstos unknown, unknowable, from a- + gnōstos known, from gignōskein to know — more at know
1: a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (as God) is unknown and probably unknowable ; broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the nonexistence of God or a god2: a person unwilling to commit to an opinion about something <political agnostics>
— ag·nos·ti·cism           Listen to the pronunciation of agnosticism -tə-ˌsi-zəm noun